AMD Radeon 540X Mobile vs AMD Radeon R5 M330
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 540X Mobile and AMD Radeon R5 M330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 540X Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 955 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 1893.2x more texture fill rate: 39.00 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3100 vs 1155
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3100 vs 1155
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2691
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2691
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8361 vs 5871
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1425 vs 596
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 955 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.00 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 320 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3100 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3100 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 2691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 2691 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8361 vs 5871 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1425 vs 596 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330
- 527.4x better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 1.25 TFLOPs
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 1349
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 1349
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 284
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops vs 1.25 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 vs 1349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 vs 1349 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 vs 284 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 540X Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M330
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 540X Mobile | AMD Radeon R5 M330 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3100 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3100 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1349 | 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1349 | 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 2691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 2691 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8361 | 5871 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 284 | 519 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1425 | 596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.096 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 540X Mobile | AMD Radeon R5 M330 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Exo |
Design | Radeon 500X Series | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 926 | 928 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Compute units | 8 | 5 |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz | 955 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.25 TFLOPs | 659.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 9.80 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.00 GTexel/s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 32 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 18 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |