AMD Radeon 660M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 660M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Video outputs and ports, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 660M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 1868.9x more texture fill rate: 45.60 GTexel/s vs 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
- 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 2x 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 20 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 45.60 GTexel/s vs 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 vs 2x 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 660M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Name | AMD Radeon 660M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14039 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 70 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 658 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 658 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 660M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Rembrandt | G98 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 20 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1335 | 1332 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $131.43 | |
Price now | $80.99 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 65 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1459 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 2x 8 |
Pixel fill rate | 30.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 45.60 GTexel/s | 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 13100 million | 210 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 22.4 gflops | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 11.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2x 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |