AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD FirePro V4900
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 680M and AMD FirePro V4900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Video outputs and ports, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 680M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 5500x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 768 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26437 vs 12641
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 1 November 2011 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 480 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26437 vs 12641 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 680M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 680M | AMD FirePro V4900 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2322 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26437 | 12641 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 990 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 392.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.597 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.818 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 680M | AMD FirePro V4900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Rembrandt | Turks |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 1 November 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 955 | 952 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 13100 million | 716 million |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |