AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 680M and NVIDIA Quadro P600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Video outputs and ports, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 680M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1557 MHz
- 3024.1x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26608 vs 11181
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 7 February 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1329 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1557 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s vs 34.92 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26608 vs 11181 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 680M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P600
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 680M | NVIDIA Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 378 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26608 | 11181 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 680M | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Rembrandt | GP107 |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 7 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1232 | 556 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
| Price now | $169.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1557 MHz |
| Compute units | 12 | |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1329 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | 34.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13100 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |

