AMD Radeon E8870 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E8870 and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8870
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 669 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 2x 320
- Around 79% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1656 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3368 vs 822
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 708 vs 422
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 vs 4 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 669 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 2x 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1656 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3368 vs 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 vs 422 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
- 4.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8870
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E8870 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3368 | 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 | 422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 874.689 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.11 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4620 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4620 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E8870 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Saturn | RV670 |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 | 4 April 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 352 | 349 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 669 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2x 320 |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 2x 53.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |