AMD Radeon E9174 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9174 MXM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon E9174 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9174 MXM

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt

Launch date	3 October 2017 vs 1 February 2017
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 75 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1219 MHz
Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
Around 99% better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6000 MHz

Core clock speed	1493 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz vs 1219 MHz
Texture fill rate	77.76 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 512
Floating-point performance	2,488 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 6000 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9174 MXM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Name	AMD Radeon E9174 MXM	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
PassMark - G3D Mark		5918
PassMark - G2D Mark		323
Geekbench - OpenCL		20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2340

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon E9174 MXM	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Pascal
Code name	Lexa	GP106B
Launch date	3 October 2017	1 February 2017
Place in performance rating	not rated	533
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1620 MHz
Core clock speed	1124 MHz	1493 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	2,488 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	16 nm
Pipelines	512	768
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	77.76 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	4,400 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB / s	112.1 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection