AMD Radeon HD 6650A vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6650A and NVIDIA GeForce 9800S videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6650A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 7.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 64
- 3x better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 836 vs 636
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 April 2011 vs 15 July 2008 |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops vs 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 836 vs 636 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 427 vs 418
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 vs 418 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6650A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6650A | NVIDIA GeForce 9800S |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 | 427 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 836 | 636 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6650A | NVIDIA GeForce 9800S | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Onega | G94 |
| Launch date | 19 April 2011 | 15 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 382 | 380 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 19.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | VGAHDMISingle Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
