AMD Radeon HD 7550M vs ATI Radeon E2400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7550M and ATI Radeon E2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7550M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 5x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 400 vs 40
- 10x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 48 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 8.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 465 vs 52
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 403 vs 287
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2012 vs 28 June 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 400 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 465 vs 52 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 vs 287 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E2400
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 450 MHz
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7550M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E2400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7550M | ATI Radeon E2400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 465 | 52 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 287 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5371 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7550M | ATI Radeon E2400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale |
Code name | Thames | RV610 |
Launch date | 7 January 2012 | 28 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 569 | 572 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 550 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |