AMD Radeon HD 7570 OEM vs NVIDIA GRID K1
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7570 OEM and NVIDIA GRID K1 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570 OEM
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 39 Watt vs 130 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K1
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 31.8x more texture fill rate: 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 13 GTexel / s
- Around 92% higher pipelines: 4x 192 vs 400
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 4x 326.4 gflops vs 624 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4x 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 13 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4x 192 vs 400 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 326.4 gflops vs 624 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4x 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K1
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7570 OEM | NVIDIA GRID K1 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 651 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1976 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 169.864 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.336 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.734 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.43 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 319 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7570 OEM | NVIDIA GRID K1 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Redwood | GK107 |
Launch date | 20 March 2013 | 18 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1525 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,140 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 624 gflops | 4x 326.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 4x 192 |
Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s | 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 627 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4x 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 4x 28.51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 4x 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |