AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 669 MHz
- 2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 2x 320
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1656 MHz
Launch date | 7 March 2013 vs 4 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 669 MHz |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 2x 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1656 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 200 Watt
Texture fill rate | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.802 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.769 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 370.179 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 822 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Tahiti | RV670 |
Launch date | 7 March 2013 | 4 April 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 612 | 344 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 669 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops | 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2x 320 |
Texture fill rate | 89.6 GTexel / s | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.0 GB / s | 2x 53.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |