AMD Radeon HD 8330E vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8330E and NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8330E
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 23 Watt
Launch date | 23 April 2013 vs 5 January 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 460 vs 259
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 83
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1864 vs 1214
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 460 vs 259 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 vs 83 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1864 vs 1214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8330E
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8330E | NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 259 | 460 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 83 | 94 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1214 | 1864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.099 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 131.334 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.355 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.015 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2623 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2623 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8330E | NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Kalindi | GF108 |
Launch date | 23 April 2013 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1538 | 1541 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 9.6 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |