AMD Radeon HD 8510 OEM vs NVIDIA GRID K520
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8510 OEM and NVIDIA GRID K520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8510 OEM
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 134.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 480
- 7.8x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops vs 624.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8510 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K520
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8510 OEM | NVIDIA GRID K520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8510 OEM | NVIDIA GRID K520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Turks | GK104 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 762 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 2x 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |