AMD Radeon Instinct MI8 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI8 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 713 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 256.0 GTexel / s vs 121.6 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1792
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 8,192 gflops vs 3,892 gflops
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 713 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s vs 121.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops vs 3,892 gflops |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI8 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5554 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI8 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Fiji | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 12 December 2016 | 18 November 2016 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 486 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 713 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops | 3,892 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s | 121.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 5,700 million |
Boost clock speed | 1086 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 152 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM | GDDR5 |