AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO W6300 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO W6300
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1512 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 2040 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- 9x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1512 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2040 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 97.92 GTexel/s
- 6.3x more pipelines: 4864 vs 768
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
Launch date | 19 Oct 2022 vs 19 Jan 2022 |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 97.92 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO W6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Name | AMD Radeon PRO W6300 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 667 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5560 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12269 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 24 | GA104 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 19 Oct 2022 |
Place in performance rating | 132 | 129 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2040 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1512 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.28 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 97.92 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.00 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 32 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |