AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 9815.4x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 13 billion / sec
- 22x more pipelines: 1408 vs 64
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 3 March 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s vs 13 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 64 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 85 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 45467 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 504 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Navi 14 | G94 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 3 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 401 | 402 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.083 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 64 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s | 13 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 128 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
