AMD Radeon R5 A330 vs AMD Radeon R9 M275X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 A330 and AMD Radeon R9 M275X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 A330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20041 vs 11041
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 October 2015 vs 28 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20041 vs 11041 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X
- Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- Around 80% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 659.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 A330
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 A330 | AMD Radeon R9 M275X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20041 | 11041 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1616 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 283.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.407 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3265 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1228 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3265 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1228 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1705 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 A330 | AMD Radeon R9 M275X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Exo | Venus |
Launch date | 21 October 2015 | 28 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1094 | 1096 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 37 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,500 million |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |