AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand and AMD Radeon R9 M290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M290X
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 72 GTexel / s vs 16.8 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 2,304 gflops vs 537.6 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 72 GTexel / s vs 16.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops vs 537.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M290X
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand | AMD Radeon R9 M290X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3256 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23514 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.022 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 936.497 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.62 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 77.584 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.046 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2526 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2526 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand | AMD Radeon R9 M290X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Mars | Neptune |
Launch date | 10 January 2014 | 9 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 598 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 537.6 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 16.8 GTexel / s | 72 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,800 million |
Compute units | 20 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |