AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 405

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 405 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 700 MHz
Launch date 1 June 2016 vs 1 April 2015
Boost clock speed 800 MHz vs 700 MHz

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 405

  • 2x more core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 15 Watt
Core clock speed 400 MHz vs 200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 6 Watt vs 15 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 405

Name AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics Intel HD Graphics 405
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.596
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 85.634
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 6.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 14.246
Geekbench - OpenCL 1642

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics Intel HD Graphics 405

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Generation 8.0
Code name Stoney Braswell GT1
Launch date 1 June 2016 1 April 2015
Place in performance rating 1690 1693
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz 700 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt
Transistor count 3,100 million 189 million
Floating-point performance 213.1 gflops
Pipelines 16
Texture fill rate 13.32 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit