AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 260X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 25.7x more texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 93.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3183 vs 34
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 266
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 21 January 2003 |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3183 vs 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 266 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 260X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 260X | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3183 | 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 804.436 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3845 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3845 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 260X | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Bonaire | NV30 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 21 January 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Place in performance rating | 639 | 641 |
Price now | $239 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 125 million |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |