AMD Radeon R7 M440 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M440 and NVIDIA GeForce 930MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 952 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5598 vs 5525
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 1 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1021 MHz vs 952 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5598 vs 5525 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 24.48 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 783.4 gflops vs 653.4 gflops
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1286 vs 896
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 172
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2053 vs 1935
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2053 vs 1935
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 2067
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 2067
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2537
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2537
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops vs 653.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1286 vs 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 vs 2067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 vs 2067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2537 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M440
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M440 | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | 1286 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2067 | 3577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2067 | 3577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2537 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2537 | 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5598 | 5525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M440 | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Meso | GM108 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 1 March 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1125 | 1126 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1021 MHz | 952 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 653.4 gflops | 783.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 20.42 GTexel / s | 24.48 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |