AMD Radeon R7 M520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 924 MHz
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 January 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 924 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- 3x more texture fill rate: 60.8 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 320
- 3x better floating-point performance: 1,946 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops vs 659.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17889 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Oland | GM206 |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 January 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1182 | 1184 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 924 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 1,946 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 60.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,940 million |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |