AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7870M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 93% higher texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
- Around 92% better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
- Around 63% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 586 vs 556
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3182 vs 1507
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 1,024 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 586 vs 556 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3182 vs 1507 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870M
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 85 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1367 vs 971
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1367 vs 971
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1980
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1980
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1367 vs 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1367 vs 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1980 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7870M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 586 | 556 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3182 | 1507 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 971 | 1367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 971 | 1367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1980 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1980 | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7870M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Bonaire | Heathrow |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 573 | 574 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 183 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 104.0 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |