AMD Radeon R9 M365X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M365X and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M365X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 13 billion / sec
- 10x more pipelines: 640 vs 64
- 9.3x better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 128 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 446 vs 407
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1482 vs 504
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 3 March 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 13 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 128 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 446 vs 407 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1482 vs 504 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M365X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M365X | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36410 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 446 | 407 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1482 | 504 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M365X | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Tropo | G94 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 380 | 377 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 128 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 13 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Gigaflops | 192 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA |
Eyefinity | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore | ||
CUDA | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |