AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M390 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, API support, Memory, Technologies, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20250 vs 11013
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 31.935
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 539.966
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 2.344
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 35.841
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 64.308
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 4184
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3333
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 4184
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3333
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 09 June 2015 vs 25 January 2011 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 vs 11013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 31.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 539.966 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 2.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 35.841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 64.308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 4184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 4184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1232
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1232
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1232 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 | 11013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 31.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 539.966 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 2.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 35.841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 64.308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 4184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 4184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3333 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3038 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 425 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Pitcairn | GF114 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 09 June 2015 | 25 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 831 | 822 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Price now | $138 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.88 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 128.3 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 52.7 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin |