AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 834 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 22.2x more texture fill rate: 93.41 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 5460 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 360
- 43.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4911 vs 114
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 20 April 2006 |
Core clock speed | 834 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 93.41 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5460 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 vs 360 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4911 vs 114 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition | NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 | 360 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4911 | 114 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23550 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.272 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 778.867 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.051 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.811 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition | NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Curie |
Code name | Grenada | G73 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 20 April 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 446 | 447 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Price now | $150.25 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 834 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,989 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | |
Texture fill rate | 93.41 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 177 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 198 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 174.7 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5460 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore |