AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4813 vs 4579
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 27 August 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 vs 4579 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 256.0 GTexel / s vs 162.36 GT/s
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s vs 162.36 GT/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Nano
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8785 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44380 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 | 4579 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 | AMD Radeon R9 Nano | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 3.0 |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 27 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 259 | 261 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Code name | Fiji | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.4 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 59 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s | 256.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 8,900 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 152 mm | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 4096 bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Vulkan |