AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1168 MHz vs 669 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 4.2x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1656 MHz
- 9.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7690 vs 822
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 660 vs 422
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 October 2018 vs 4 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz vs 669 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1656 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7690 vs 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 660 vs 422 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7690 | 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 660 | 422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34637 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 118.97 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2403.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.935 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 127.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.512 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3755 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Polaris 20 | RV670 |
Launch date | 15 October 2018 | 4 April 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 343 | 342 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1284 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz | 669 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 666 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 428.2 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2x 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 53.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |