AMD Radeon RX 6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6300 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6300
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 2040 MHz vs 1755 MHz
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 640 vs 626
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 2040 MHz vs 1755 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 640 vs 626 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 140.4 GTexel/s vs 97.92 GTexel/s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14422 vs 5648
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s vs 97.92 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 6 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14422 vs 5648 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6300 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 640 | 626 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5648 | 14422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74301 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6300 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | Navi 24 | AD107 |
Launch date | Never Released | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 139 | 137 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2040 MHz | 1755 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 4 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.28 GPixel/s | 56.16 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 97.92 GTexel/s | 140.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x HDMI 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.00 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 32 bit | 96 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |