AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1980 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 2755 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 352.6 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1022 vs 644
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17186 vs 15381
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1980 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2755 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 352.6 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1022 vs 644 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17186 vs 15381 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- 2.5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2048
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 190 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 92696 vs 83945
- Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2379 vs 2346
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2048 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92696 vs 83945 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2379 vs 2346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1022 | 644 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17186 | 15381 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83945 | 92696 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2346 | 2379 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 33 | GA104 |
Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 78 | 81 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2755 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1980 MHz | 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 176.3 GPixel/s | 103.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 352.6 GTexel/s | 206.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 13300 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 204 mm, 8 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 115 mm, 4.5 inches | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |