AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1406 MHz vs 384
- 11.7x more texture fill rate: 429.3 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec
- 10.7x more pipelines: 4096 vs 384
- 15.6x better floating-point performance: 13,738 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 26% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Launch date | 8 August 2017 vs 5 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz vs 384 |
Texture fill rate | 429.3 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7765 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2360 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Vega 10 | GF104 |
Launch date | 8 August 2017 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 265 | 262 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz | 384 |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 429.3 GTexel / s | 36.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | 96.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |