AMD Radeon Vega 7 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 7 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 7
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1900 MHz vs 1176 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1262 vs 1231
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz vs 1176 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1262 vs 1231 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Pipelines | 640 vs 448 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 7
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1262 | 1231 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3366 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10985 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 7 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega | Maxwell |
Code name | Renoir | GM107 |
Launch date | Q1'2020 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1044 | 735 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz | 1176 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,505 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 47.04 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Number of simultaneous displays | 3 | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Laptop size | medium sized |