ATI FireGL X1-128 vs ATI Radeon 9000 LE

Comparative analysis of ATI FireGL X1-128 and ATI Radeon 9000 LE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL X1-128

  • Around 30% higher core clock speed: 325 MHz vs 250 MHz
  • 2.6x more texture fill rate: 2.6 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 128 MB vs 64 MB
  • Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 620 MHz vs 400 MHz
Core clock speed 325 MHz vs 250 MHz
Texture fill rate 2.6 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
Maximum memory size 128 MB vs 64 MB
Memory clock speed 620 MHz vs 400 MHz

Compare specifications (specs)

ATI FireGL X1-128 ATI Radeon 9000 LE

Essentials

Architecture Rage 8 Rage 7
Code name R300 RV250
Launch date 1 July 2002 1 July 2002
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Type Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 325 MHz 250 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 150 nm 150 nm
Texture fill rate 2.6 GTexel / s 1 GTexel / s
Transistor count 110 million 36 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 28 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x S-Video 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface AGP 8x AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 9.0 8.1
OpenGL 2.0 1.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 64 MB
Memory bandwidth 19.84 GB / s 6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 620 MHz 400 MHz
Memory type DDR DDR

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare ATI FireGL X1-128 with others

ATI FireGL X1-128 ATI
FireGL X1-128
vs ATI Radeon 9000 LE ATI
Radeon 9000 LE
ATI FireGL X1-128 ATI
FireGL X1-128
vs ATI Radeon 9000 ATI
Radeon 9000
ATI FireGL X1-128 ATI
FireGL X1-128
vs ATI FireGL X1-256 ATI
FireGL X1-256