ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 and NVIDIA Tesla C1060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Memory, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Launch date | 1 August 2010 vs 9 April 2009 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C1060
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | NVIDIA Tesla C1060 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 918 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 918 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 111 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18689 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | NVIDIA Tesla C1060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RV6xx | Tesla 2.0 |
Launch date | 1 August 2010 | 9 April 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1159 | 1162 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Code name | GT200B | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 610 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | |
Pipelines | 240 | |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 188 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 |