ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
- 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 360.0 gflops vs 275.71 gflops
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 38 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 145 vs 60
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 400 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops vs 275.71 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 38 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 145 vs 60 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1436 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 651 vs 449
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11217 vs 3776
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1436 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 651 vs 449 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11217 vs 3776 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 449 | 651 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 145 | 60 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3329 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3776 | 11217 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Madison | GT215 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1370 | 1371 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1436 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops | 275.71 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 38 Watt |
Transistor count | 627 million | 727 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Gigaflops | 413 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Single Link DVILVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortVGA |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |