ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 3.6x more pipelines: 400 vs 112
- Around 69% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 308 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 26 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 500 vs 379
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 148 vs 43
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 3 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 400 vs 112 |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops vs 308 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 26 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 500 vs 379 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 vs 43 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 31 billion / sec vs 13 GTexel / s
- 11.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3085 vs 273
- 11.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3085 vs 273
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31 billion / sec vs 13 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3085 vs 273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3085 vs 273 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 500 | 379 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 | 43 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 273 | 3085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 273 | 3085 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Madison | G92 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1428 | 1446 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1375 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops | 308 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s | 31 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 26 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 627 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Gigaflops | 462 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 61 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD |