ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 120 vs 96
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 69 Watt
Pipelines | 120 vs 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 69 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 796 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 6.37 GTexel / s
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 257.28 gflops vs 191.04 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 792 MHz
Core clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 796 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 6.37 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops vs 191.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 792 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Name | ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 504 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 48 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1979 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1979 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1385 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | RV635 | GT215 |
Launch date | 22 November 2009 | 17 November 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1390 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | |
Price now | $37.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.27 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 796 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 191.04 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 120 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 6.37 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 378 million | 727 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105C C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 190 mm | 6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm) |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB or 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.67 GB / s | 54.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 792 MHz | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |