ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 54.3x more texture fill rate: 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 90 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2x 1 GB vs 128 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 11.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1309 vs 114
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 565 vs 360
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 August 2008 vs 20 April 2006 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 1 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1309 vs 114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 565 vs 360 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
- 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 286 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 286 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1309 | 114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 565 | 360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3323 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3323 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Curie |
Code name | R700 | G73 |
Launch date | 12 August 2008 | 20 April 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $550 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 441 | 444 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $150.25 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 800 | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 286 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 956 million | 177 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 1 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 115.2 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |