ATI Radeon X1650 XT AGP vs ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon X1650 XT AGP and ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1650 XT AGP
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 66 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 66 Watt |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 540 MHz
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 6.9 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1360 MHz
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.9 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1360 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon X1650 XT AGP | ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | R500 | R500 |
Code name | RV560 | RV570 |
Launch date | 30 October 2006 | 25 October 2006 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 540 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 80 nm |
Texture fill rate | 4.32 GTexel / s | 6.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 66 Watt |
Transistor count | 330 million | 330 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 8x | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 21.76 GB / s | 44.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1360 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |