ATI Radeon X1650 XT vs ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon X1650 XT and ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1650 XT
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 66 Watt
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 66 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 525 MHz
- Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 6.9 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 525 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.9 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon X1650 XT | ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | R500 | R500 |
Code name | RV560 | RV570 |
Launch date | 30 October 2006 | 25 October 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 525 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 80 nm |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | 6.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 66 Watt |
Transistor count | 330 million | 330 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | 44.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |