ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP and ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 350 MHz
Launch date | 17 October 2007 vs 28 February 2007 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 110 nm
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 36 vs 30
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 110 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 36 vs 30 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP
GPU 2: ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP | ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 30 | 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 192 | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP | ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Rage 9 | R400 |
Code name | RS482 | RS690 |
Launch date | 17 October 2007 | 28 February 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 908 | 910 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 80 nm |
Transistor count | 120 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0 | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.0 |