ATI Rage 128 VR vs NVIDIA Riva TNT
Comparative analysis of ATI Rage 128 VR and NVIDIA Riva TNT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Rage 128 VR
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 250 nm vs 350 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 MB vs 16 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 125 MHz vs 110 MHz
Launch date | 1 August 1998 vs 23 March 1998 |
Manufacturing process technology | 250 nm vs 350 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 MB vs 16 MB |
Memory clock speed | 125 MHz vs 110 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Riva TNT
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 90 MHz vs 80 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 180.0 MTexel / s vs 160.0 MTexel / s
Core clock speed | 90 MHz vs 80 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 180.0 MTexel / s vs 160.0 MTexel / s |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Rage 128 VR | NVIDIA Riva TNT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Code name | Rage 128 | NV4 |
Launch date | 1 August 1998 | 23 March 1998 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture | Fahrenheit | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 80 MHz | 90 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 250 nm | 350 nm |
Texture fill rate | 160.0 MTexel / s | 180.0 MTexel / s |
Transistor count | 8 million | 7 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x VGA | 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 2x | AGP 2x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 6.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 16 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 1 GB / s | 1.76 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 125 MHz | 110 MHz |
Memory type | SDR | SDR |