Apple M1 Ultra 48-core vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 Ultra 48-core and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 Ultra 48-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1296 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
Launch date | 18 Mar 2022 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 12 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- 53.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 48
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 120 Watt
Pipelines | 2560 vs 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 Ultra 48-core
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Name | Apple M1 Ultra 48-core | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 94307 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 535 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Apple M1 Ultra 48-core | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 18 Mar 2022 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 177 | 183 |
Architecture | Turing | |
Code name | TU104 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1110 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.925 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 48 | 2560 |
Render output units | 192 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 110 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | |
Transistor count | 13600 million | |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 819.2 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 1024 bit | 256 bit |
Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan |