Intel Arc A570M vs NVIDIA Tesla P4
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A570M and NVIDIA Tesla P4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A570M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- 978.2x more texture fill rate: 166.4 GTexel/s vs 170.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57815 vs 37732
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2023 vs 13 September 2016 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 166.4 GTexel/s vs 170.1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57815 vs 37732 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A570M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A570M | NVIDIA Tesla P4 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57815 | 37732 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8768 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A570M | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
Code name | DG2-256 | GP104 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2023 | 13 September 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 370 | 366 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 810 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 166.4 GTexel/s | 170.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops | |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |