Intel GMA X3500 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

Comparative analysis of Intel GMA X3500 and ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

  • Around 20% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 667 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
Core clock speed 800 MHz vs 667 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 90 nm

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel GMA X3500 ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

Essentials

Architecture Generation 4.0 TeraScale
Code name Bearlake RV630
Launch date 1 August 2007 26 July 2007
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 667 MHz 800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt
Floating-point performance 2x 192 gflops
Pipelines 2x 120
Texture fill rate 2x 6.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Transistor count 390 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 9.0c 10.0
OpenGL 2.0 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2x 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 2x 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR3

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare Intel GMA X3500 with others

Intel GMA X3500 Intel
GMA X3500
vs ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP ATI
Radeon HD 4670 AGP
Intel GMA X3500 Intel
GMA X3500
vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 ATI
Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
Intel GMA X3500 Intel
GMA X3500
vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition ATI
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition