Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Comparative analysis of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Around 56% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 400 MHz
3.2x more pipelines: 32 vs 10

Core clock speed	625 MHz vs 400 MHz
Pipelines	32 vs 10

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Name	Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M	NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
PassMark - G3D Mark		173
PassMark - G2D Mark		135
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		2337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		2337

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M	NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Essentials
Code name	GL40	G96
Launch date	1 October 2008	1 October 2008
Place in performance rating	not rated	1304
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Architecture		Tesla
Technical info
Core clock speed	400 MHz	625 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	10	32
Floating-point performance		99.2 gflops
Texture fill rate		10 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		50 Watt
Transistor count		314 million
API support
DirectX	10	10.0
OpenGL		3.3
Memory
Memory type	mit Hauptspeicher geteilt (shared) bis 384 MB	GDDR3
Shared memory	yes	0
Maximum RAM amount		512 MB
Memory bandwidth		25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1600 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface		MXM-II
Laptop size		large
Technologies
PowerMizer 8.0
PureVideo HD