Intel Arc A350M vs AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A350M and AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A350M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23952 vs 8770
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 vs 13 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23952 vs 8770 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A350M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A350M | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23952 | 8770 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1582 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A350M | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | DG2-128 | Owl |
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 | 13 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 964 | 965 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1150 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Pixel fill rate | 52.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 4,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |