Intel Arc A730M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A730M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A730M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1468 MHz
• 1675.6x more texture fill rate: 393.6 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70789 vs 48090

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• 5.7x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 715 vs 683
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11414 vs 10488
• 3.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6008 vs 1793

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A730M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	70789 48090
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	683 715
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10488 11414
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1793 6008

Compare specifications (specs)