Intel Arc Pro A40 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A40 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 5037x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel/s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 55 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel/s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 320 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A40
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Name | Intel Arc Pro A40 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33073 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 463 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 375 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2907 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2907 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc Pro A40 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | TeraScale |
Code name | DG2-128 | M96 |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 9 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 698 | 695 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 675 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 870.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.963 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.482 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 54.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel/s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 514 million |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |