Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

• 3.5x more core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 1024 vs 256
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6514 vs 1908
• 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39228 vs 7628
• 44.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 72

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	532 336
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1908 6514
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7628 39228
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	72 3172

Compare specifications (specs)