Matrox G550 vs Matrox Parhelia 128 MB
Comparative analysis of Matrox G550 and Matrox Parhelia 128 MB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Matrox Parhelia 128 MB
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 200 MHz vs 125 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 250.0 MTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 150 nm vs 180 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 128 MB vs 32 MB
- Around 51% higher memory clock speed: 500 MHz vs 332 MHz
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz vs 125 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s vs 250.0 MTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm vs 180 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 128 MB vs 32 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz vs 332 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Matrox G550 | Matrox Parhelia 128 MB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | G500 | Parhelia |
| Code name | Condor | Parhelia-512 |
| Launch date | 1 January 2001 | 1 January 2001 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 125 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 150 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 250.0 MTexel / s | 800 MTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 10 million | 80 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | AGP 4x | AGP 8x |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 8.0 | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 2.656 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 332 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR | DDR |